Of the "deep state" and the inverse, partisan logic of "believability"

Not long after President Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory, Conservative talk show hosts began to speak about the establishment in government that began to come forward and pronounce themselves by speech or behavior as “never Trumpers” - in other words, the below cabinet member level establishment, the career federal government civil service bureaucrat resistance to the new President and his “Make America Great Again” policies.

The more successful Trump and his policies became the more hard-line and obvious their resistance became. It wasn’t long before this resistance began being referred to as the “Deep State;” by definition “a body of...influential members of government agencies..., believed to be involved in the secret manipulation or control of government policy.”

Until this past week, I’d more or less thought of the “Deep State” as more hyperbole than reality.

But, this past week, America has been forced to watch one of the most embarrassing, disgusting and utterly revolting displays imaginable by the Legislative branch of our federal government.

We have been forced to watch our tax dollars wasted while Democrat senators on the Judiciary Committee grilled a 53-year-old sitting federal judge (now a Supreme Court nominee) explain and defend his behavior as a 17 year old high school student right down to the immature notes he wrote in someone’s yearbook about their flatulence problems or their tendency to stutter when saying the “F word.”

Really? Seriously? Our tax dollars funding days and days of Senators’ time to talk about immature teenagers tee-hee-hee’ing about farts and the “F word?” 

Really? Seriously? Our tax dollars funding days and days of Senators’ time to talk about immature teenagers tee-hee-hee’ing about farts and the “F word?”

We had to watch while his family had to watch the absolutely inane allegations that he as a teenager had inappropriately groped her and tried to take her clothes off at a party - a charge supported by so little corroboration that her allegations made a torn piece of cheesecloth look more sturdy, solid and capable of “holding more water” than her case against the nominee.

Yet this flaky accuser, whose physical appearance made her more resemble the Garth Agar character in “Wayne’s World” and a person with obvious “issues” than a professional with credible testimony, and her grossly uncorroborated allegations were resoundingly declared believable by the “usual suspects” on the Democrat side of the Judiciary Committee.

What made that even more appalling and falling was their judgment that even though the nominee consistently denied the allegations AND that his classmates at the time who were at the event in question sent in testimony sworn under penalty of perjury that the nominee was not present at all at said event let alone behaved in the way alleged, he was not believable or credible but she was.

Many other female former HS and college classmates as well as adult colleagues all signed a letter defending nominee Kavenaugh saying he is not such a beast as this allegation would imply – but still, the Democrat side of the aisle and other brainwashed liberals like them believe HER and not HIM.

When the testimony of their straw accuser, Dr Christine Blasey-Ford, came under reasonable doubt - she doesn’t know how she got to the party, she doesn’t know how she got home from it, she didnt exactly see Brett Kavenaugh during her attack but she is, by God, “100% sure” he was the one who did it. And, still they believe her not him.

Apparently her firm opinions didn’t bother her enough when Kavenaugh was a sitting federal judge since 2003 to bring her charges up. Only when he became a Trump nominee for Associate Justice to the Supreme Court, then and only then did it bother her enough to speak up.

And, isn’t it a coincidence that Blasey-Ford is 1) a registered Democrat, 2) has made contributions to political organizations that support the Democrat agenda, 3) last year she participated in a local Women's March protesting President Trump as well as 4) attended a San Francisco (always a haven for far-out left-wing types) March for Science to protest the Trump administration's cuts to research?

Not only that, she’s demonstrated her capacity for flaky memory and falsehood both.

Firstly, she couldn’t remember hardly ANY details at all about the July, 1982 party she and Kavenaugh were at and at which she was “100% sure” Kavenaugh attacked her at yet she couldn’t even remember if she’d given the Washington Post her therapy notes just a few weeks ago!

Secondly, - claiming she couldn’t immediately appear before the Judiciary Committee in the time they wanted because she was clear across the country and afraid of flying. Isn’t it interesting how in reality she was a veteran airline traveler (Blasey-Ford’s own C.V., confirmed in her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee just last week, lists her interests in surf travel to Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific islands and French Polynesia.) Not only that, but she freely admitted that she travels once a year to nearby Delaware every year at the end of July, the first of August for family reunions. In fact, she was JUST THERE A FEW WEEKS AGO.

So, she claims she has a fear of flying unless it’s traveling for fun. Blasey-Ford said in her own sworn testimony last week says [It is] “Easier for me to travel…when it’s a vacation.” She claims that she couldn’t travel to DC to testify because of her alleged fear of flying and schedule commitments but, in reality, at the time, she was not across the country at all but just a state or two away from Washington, DC and could’ve drove down there in the allowed time?

Yet, this woman was immediately and continually pronounced “believable” and her flimsy allegations instantly “credible” by the whackjob leftists on the Judiciary Committee like those bitter, vicious hags Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Kamala Harris (another D-CA) and “Crazy Mazie” Hirono (D-HI).

Unbelievable.

And, as such, the derogatory descriptions of this past week's proceedings - "a circus", "despicable," "no longer advise and counsel but search and destroy"  are accurate.

What’s even more appalling is when one realizes the not-so-veiled threat in all of this Kangaroo Court that’s been putting nominee Kavenaugh through these past weeks; that message is, “This will happen to you, too if you dare oppose the ‘deep state.’”

Yes, the way Brett Kavenaugh has been smeared, slandered and humiliated - all under the false colors of “how good of a Supreme Court Justice would he make” - has convinced me the deep state is real.

God, guns and guts; going, going…gone?

Saw a thought-provoking bumper sticker on my morning commute. From the back of the vehicle ahead of me, It proclaimed “God, guns and guts - have kept America free for over 200 years!”

Things that make ya say “Hmm....”

It occurs to me that over the past several decades God has been pretty thoroughly pushed out - out of schools, the workplace, government and the courts and the media....

And, we’ve so watered down our stamina through handout programs and societal concepts that we can’t risk offending anybody at all over anything and “everyone get’s a trophy” that we as a people don’t really have the “guts” we were once so famous for having - no where close to it.

So...here we sit on the precipice of the great abyss... the week before a planned nationwide school student walkout for safer schools in the wake of the latest mass murder in a “gun free zone” (as all public schools are). Now, they’re not walking out demanding armed police be stationed INside their schools to protect them. They’re not demanding a few armed and trained teachers to be able to respond far quicker from INside the school than law enforcement OUTside and from farther away could do.

They’re not even demanding stricter laws governing what people with documented mental illness and criminal records can walk among us and purchase firearms.

Oh, no; they’re demanding we take punitive action against the gun! Like take it away kind of actions, banning certain kinds of semi-automatic firearms and magazines greater than a handful of rounds and so on.

So, God’s pretty well gone from our everyday culture. The people with “guts” are more and more dissipating from our world. When guns are gone, how long will America – as we ever knew it – last?

Why should firearms be different than high-speed sports cars, alcohol or tobacco?

As these psychotics continue to shoot up public places - schools, churches, restaurants, and shopping malls - continuing to add to the tragic body count, the "usual suspects" (liberals, the media, etc) start up the predictable harping their usual cries for gun control. And as they do, they continue to display inconsistent logic, hypocritical standards and their whole lack of respect for and knowledge of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

They employ tactics like asking gun owners "Why do you need a fill the blank with the appropriate firearm or associated accessory?"

I would counter their question with a question: Do we question why someone buys a car capable going twice as fast as any speed limit anywhere? No, we are satisfied that because they want it, that’s good enough with the common sense to say if they misuse it and kill somebody (or several somebodies, they're going to jail). So, why should a semi-automatic weapon be any different?

Why do we allow someone to buy unlimited amounts of alcohol - on the face of it, way beyond the amount that one human could safely consume - and yet content ourselves with the common sense that if they overdrink and hurt somebody or somebodies they go to jail? Why would a semiautomatic firearm be any different?

And, it should be pointed out; there is no Constitutional right to purchase or own alcohol like the Second Amendment provides for firearms.

Why do we allow the sale of tobacco - a known carcinogen and literally a killer of millions - that has no positive benefit other than to quench someone else’s desire for it. Yet, we let people buy it without questioning why they do it. And they're allowed to buy it with no special permits, waiting periods or background checks. And when people misuse tobacco, nobody throws a hissy and calls for its ban. So why should a firearm be treated differently than tobacco.

And, remember; there is no Constitutional right to purchase or own alcohol like the Second Amendment provides for firearms.

Its called freedom and individual liberties and, oh yes, in the case of firearms it's the legal premise that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” just like the Second Amendment in the Bill of RIGHTS to the US Constitution says.

Yet, one has to ask, why is it that liberals are oh-so-eager to deny those Constitutionally-protected rights of gun owners and/or to legislate them to death to the point they practially don’t exist? And why do they throw a hissy whenever anyone suggests a law requiring a valid ID to vote? Why should firearms be treated differently than the right to vote? "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can."* (The Patriot)

Because, as these gun-grabbing liberals demonstrate more and more every day with their inconsistencies and lack of sound logic, to them “gun control” is only about getting more and more control over everyone else and has little or nothing at all to do with guns.

The only legitimate version of gun control is the one that allows you to hit what you’re aiming at.

*Emmerich, Roland, director. The patriot. Columbia Pictures, 2000.

Wake up, America. The usurpers and subversives haven’t gone away - far from it. PART ONE

Wake up, America - while there’s still time.

While we who truly love this once-great country dearly and want to save it from the hopelessly naive utopians likes of Bernie Sanders and the cancerous termite scum likes of Michael Moore, George Soros, may have been breathing a long overdue sigh of relief with the election of President Donald Trump, now is NOT the time. While we are all rolling up our sleeves and getting behind Trump as he strives to “Make America Great Again, our country is not out of danger yet - far from it!

The termites are actively eating away at the very foundation of our country to say nothing of the support beams and load-bearing walls holding up our freedoms.

This past year we may have been lulled into thinking the biggest obstacle to “MAGA” was motivating the largely spineless GOP Congress to actively and substantively backing Trump and the voting majority who elected him and his MAGA agenda into the Oval Office. We may have been lulled into thinking that sending Hillary Clinton home in defeat and denying her the presidency and the opportunity to further the destruction of America damn near accomplished by Barry Hussein Obama

Bill of rights ratified in 1791 it included first and second amendments that guaranteed - not allowed, but guaranteed!- the American public’s Constitutional rights (not privileges) to freely speak, assemble and worship along with the right to arm itself to protect itself from whatever threats needed - individual or otherwise.

Wake up, America. Do you see what’s been slowly but steadily been happening to those guaranteed rights the past 25 years?

Beginning in Hillary’s husband’s 8 years in power your rights of “Freedom of Religion” came under attack with proposals that tried to assail Christianity with oppressions that tried to make the simple wearing of cross/crucifix jewelry be considered actionable as “religious harassment.” (Remember that? Thankfully that failed to see fruition back then. But, would it nowadays?)

But the disease attacking our freedom of religion, while seemingly in remission the 8 years of George W. Bush was still silently at work to the point where during Obama’s regime freedom OF religion became interpreted to be freedom FROM religion. This manifested itself in continuing to ban school prayer right down to threatening sanctioning individual sports players who knelt in prayer or crossed themselves and pointed to heaven after scoring a great play for their team.

That’s just to mention a few liberal/progressive threats to the first amendment protection of our individual and corporate right to free worship.

Continue on to Part Two....

Wake up, America. The usurpers and subversives haven’t gone away - far from it. PART TWO

And look at what’s happened to free speech all this time! No longer “may sticks and stones break our bones but names will never hurt us.” Oh, no; now we have govt watchdogs and HR depts prosecuting people for “hate” speech (which seems more and more to be interpreted to be anything that liberals don’t like or disagree with).

And have you noticed what’s been happening to the concept in American juris prudence of “fair and equal justice?” What the hell IS a hate crime anyway? Apparently, a beating or a murder is not as bad when committed against individuals not meeting some “pet” demographic that liberals care about. A black perpetrator kills a white family in cold blood and, well, that’s just a simple murder. Or some psychotic Muslim US army psychiatrist shoots up a stateside army medical clinic, well, that’s not a hate crime or even terrorism, but simple “workplace violence.” But, let a couple white kids kill a black kid or a white cop shoot a black perpetrator during the commission of a crime and, well, we need a federal civil rights investigation because those kinds of situations might just damn well be a hate crime - as if a victim is any less beat up or less dead in one kind of homicide versus a “hate crime.”

Seems to me that murder (of anyone) is - on its face - a hate crime. But apparently not to liberals. It’s only a hate crime when racially motivated against blacks, illegal aliens, Muslims or homosexuals. How blatantly lopsided and biased can the law be made? The statues of a blindfolded Goddess Justice that adorns so many courthouses is being made schizophrenic with bias like that so prevalent in the Law.

Further, what’s happening to your right of Assembly? When Tea Party rallies started getting popular for a few years during the Obama regime, suddenly certain Tea Party leaders found themselves being audited by the IRS.

Now...being a patriotic American is - more and more - being blasphemed as "extremist," "right wing" and no longer "upstanding." Believing in the Constitution and it's Bill of Rights as written is sneered at as being a "literalist" and "outdated..." 

Continue on to Part Three...

Wake up, America. The usurpers and subversives haven’t gone away - far from it. PART THREE

Have you noticed how the past 10 years or so, the Second Amendment continues to get assailed. Most recently because of the outbreak of mass shootings from just plain mentally ill people or “home grown terrorism.”

One must pay very close attention to where the commas fall in the wording of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution – the second most-important part of your unalienable rights as guaranteed in the Bill of Rights:

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Notice that it’s all one phrase between the commas guaranteeing “…, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.” That’s you and me as in “We the people” as established in the Constitution’s Preamble.as the authors, benefactors and recipients of the rights laid out therein.

And, have you noticed? - slowly but surely and steadily they’re being hemmed in and taken away from us. An over-arching and overly-strong federal government restricting and taking away those very same rights were what the Declaration of Independence and America’s subsequent War For Independence and the later entire body of the Constitution document was all about – nay, is still all about.

And it was to absolutely guarantee those inalienable rights that the whole Bill of Rights to that Constitution was ratified and attached to it was all about – and is still all about.

But, our government has been willing to throw away our individual liberties more and more as liberalism/progressivism – nay, Communism by another name! – has more and more infected this once-great nation. And many of her citizens have been clamoring for this in hopes (or guise) of obtaining more security – in our schools, our shopping malls, our nightclubs and churches thereby embodying Benjamin Franklin’s famous words that “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

And this very same government actively pursuing as well as being pressured to enact stricter and stricter gun laws (like don’t we already have   laws against murdering people?) is the same federal govt that has blown it on entering the necessary information from some of their own investigations of these later-to-be-murderers that would’ve kept them from being able to legally purchase a firearm in the first place. And, oh yes; they want to watch law-abiding legal citizens of this country like you and me far more closely and deny us more and more right to self-protection.

Wake up, America - while there's still time!

What the media and the liberals refuse to discuss about mass shootings.

Agree or  disagree with me as you will, but I want to point out a few things.

No one - legal gun owner or gun opponent - advocates or condones or in anyway “likes” this kind of misuse of firearms. However, liberals over the past 5 decades have:

• succeeded in removing any mention of God in schools in just about any way at all, 
•  succeeded in taking discipline completely out of the classroom, to the point these kids aren’t even taught the most basics in self-control and mental toughness,

•  succeeded in removing any kind of Christian morality out of schools and instead embraced and installed the code of morality that “whatever makes a person happy” is the appropriate morality (right down to the point kids now aren’t sure which restroom, boys or girls, they or their classmates should use),

•  have advanced the agenda that those persons of any faith other than the politically correct kinds - Buddhism, Muslims or even Satanist- are “extremists,” “hate-mongers” and even “racists.”

Therefore to teach any kind of Creationism, school prayer - even by 1 individual football or baseball player who takes a knee in thanks to God for scoring a touchdown or a home run, or any Valedictorian or Salutatorian speeches crediting their Christian faith or mention of Jesus, or any t-shirt or hat or sticker on a notebook that mentions a pro-life stance or even “Make America Great Again” is offensive and inappropriate to be done or worn on school property.

Almost succeeded in destroying any kind of faith in our nation’s leaders, our protectors the police and the whole civic process right down to the point of accusing the Founding Fathers of being evil, racist slave owners who only built this country through oppression and slave labor and desire to dominate the world and that our national anthem is racist and not worthy of the respect of standing and saluting our flag.

So... ask yourself; is it really all that hard to believe that these morally-confused kids are more and more killing each other? And, is that really the fault that guns exist?

And of course, the anti-gun crowd and the liberal puppets in the propaganda ministry that masks itself as a mainstream media try to paint a paradigm of any legal gun owner being a hair’s breadth away from “going off their nut” and shooting up a shopping mall, their workplace or a restaurant or something.

Then ask yourself; how come back in the “cowboy days” (aka the “wild” west days) when every cowhand, blacksmith, storekeeper or hotel owner had a loaded firearm nearby if not strapped on their hip, there weren’t these kinds of shootings?

Then ask yourself; even if guns are outlawed and they really could round up every legally-owned firearm from every private citizen in the US, how can the black market purchase or theft of firearms keep them out of the hands of those who – like this mentally-damaged kid or the common criminal or…wait for it…the terrorist – shouldn’t have one.

Yeah, how is it that if terrorism is outlawed, and terrorists are wanted, hunted men, how the heck can they keep getting guns to the ISIS, al Qaeda etc?

And ask yourself this; if there’s already dozens and dozens of laws against murder, assault with a deadly weapon, shooting a firearm within city limits and etc etc etc, how on God’s green earth will one more law or a dozen more laws prohibiting firearm ownership do one danged thing to prevent some lunatic like these mass shooters from striking back at society and shooting up a school, a movie theater, a church or whatever?

The answer is, it won’t. And ask yourself this; why is it that the people crying for gun control will in no way consider putting a well-trained, armed presence inside a school – either several armed teachers or even armed police officers assigned to the school as their regular beat. They don’t want to even to consider any solutions like this. 

And why not? Because “gun control” for liberals is only about control and nothing to do with guns. They just want to take more and more of our individual liberties – firearm ownership is guaranteed in the wording of the Second Amendment remember (“…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."). And a completely disarmed American public would certainly make that a lot easier.

Anything but worthy of official presidential portraitures....

I'm anything but an art critic, but the official portraits of no-longer-POTUS-Thank- God Barry Hussein Obama and his wife Michelle are anything but presidential or statesmanlike. 

Compare what has been mocked as "taking a dump in a marijuana patch" painting of Barry and the water color of Meeshell Mah Belle to the following portraits of First Families before the Obamas below.

President George W. and First Lady Laura Bush:

Bill and Hillary Clinton (fellow Democrats like the Obamas, by the way):

Yet... THESE works are considered worthy of being the official portraits of the Obamas? Not only that, but old Barry - race baiter that he is - had his done by an artist named Kehinde Wiley who is (in)famous for two paintings each depicting a black woman swinging a decapitated white woman's head! (see below). Now can you imagine if Presidents GWB or Donald Trump had even associated with an artist with such racist works in their past as these two paintings, let alone appointed them to paint their official presidential portraits? The hue and cry and rioting would be heard as far away as the planet Jupiter and would never die down!

The only reason I post these revolting works is so there's no way you readers can miss the obvious racism and violence advocated in these works.

Now, in fairness, it must be noted that the artist for Michelle's portrait has no such "violent painting" history. 

But, how disgusting, divisive and destructive - not to mention embarrassing for our nation - to have these two paintings hang in a gallery and represent the 44th First Family in American history. These are more pop-culture, Andy Warhol kinds of works, not dignified statesmenlike portraits. And are in NO WAY the caliber or portraiture that should represent a statesman like a President of the United States.  

Then again...Obama was pretty worthless as a statesman AND A POTUS. So....

Ommmm.... Maha mantra..... The-left-is-really-coming-unhinged..... Ommmm.

I’ve heard some real doozies out of the liberal left in my day. But, one I heard about just this week - the more I think about it - has to be the weirdest, dingbattiest nonsense to come out of LaLa Land yet.

Apparently some professor of religious studies at Michigan State University - one Shreena Gandhi - co-wrote an article accusing Americans who practice yoga of...wait for it.. contributing to white supremacy and promoting the “yoga industrial complex.”*,**

Sayyyy...whut?

According to Wikipedia, yoga originated in India and is intertwined in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.* So, I just gotta ask; how on earth does practicing yoga promote “white supremacy?”

And I’m not even sure What the cornbread hell the “yoga industrial complex” even means. Somebody’s gonna have to tell me what that is before I could even know to be offended about its alleged promotion and proliferation.

And here I'd thought that cement and stone Confederate Veterans statues that had stood for decades or even over a century had last summer and fall suddenly been found to be oppressing black people was the craziest, most paranoid or most outrageous version of "victim mentality" I'd ever hear in my lifetime....

Now there's this - the white supremacy of the yoga industrial complex.... 

Just about the time I think I’ve heard everything and the left can’t possibly outstupid themselves any worse, they always find a way of rising to a new high in low or an even more unhinged concept or comment.

So, given their history, their next idea should be quite...entertaining. That’s all their thoughts are worth anymore. They long ago abandoned credibility so we might as well get a few laughs out of it. That’s about all the redeeming value liberal thoughts have to offer society anymore.

*Nash, C. (2018, January 30). Professor: White People Who Practice Yoga Contribute to White Supremacy and Yoga Industrial Complex. Retrieved February 01, 2018, from http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/01/30/professor-claims-white-people-who-practice-yoga-contribute-to-white-supremacy/

**News, F. (2018, January 29). People who practice yoga contribute to white supremacy, professor claims. Retrieved February 01, 2018, from https://nypost.com/2018/01/29/people-who-practice-yoga-contribute-to-white-supremacy-professor-claims/

* Wikipedia (26 January 2018), Yoga. Retrieved 1 February, 2018.