What the media and the liberals refuse to discuss about mass shootings.

Agree or  disagree with me as you will, but I want to point out a few things.

No one - legal gun owner or gun opponent - advocates or condones or in anyway “likes” this kind of misuse of firearms. However, liberals over the past 5 decades have:

• succeeded in removing any mention of God in schools in just about any way at all, 
•  succeeded in taking discipline completely out of the classroom, to the point these kids aren’t even taught the most basics in self-control and mental toughness,

•  succeeded in removing any kind of Christian morality out of schools and instead embraced and installed the code of morality that “whatever makes a person happy” is the appropriate morality (right down to the point kids now aren’t sure which restroom, boys or girls, they or their classmates should use),

•  have advanced the agenda that those persons of any faith other than the politically correct kinds - Buddhism, Muslims or even Satanist- are “extremists,” “hate-mongers” and even “racists.”

Therefore to teach any kind of Creationism, school prayer - even by 1 individual football or baseball player who takes a knee in thanks to God for scoring a touchdown or a home run, or any Valedictorian or Salutatorian speeches crediting their Christian faith or mention of Jesus, or any t-shirt or hat or sticker on a notebook that mentions a pro-life stance or even “Make America Great Again” is offensive and inappropriate to be done or worn on school property.

Almost succeeded in destroying any kind of faith in our nation’s leaders, our protectors the police and the whole civic process right down to the point of accusing the Founding Fathers of being evil, racist slave owners who only built this country through oppression and slave labor and desire to dominate the world and that our national anthem is racist and not worthy of the respect of standing and saluting our flag.

So... ask yourself; is it really all that hard to believe that these morally-confused kids are more and more killing each other? And, is that really the fault that guns exist?

And of course, the anti-gun crowd and the liberal puppets in the propaganda ministry that masks itself as a mainstream media try to paint a paradigm of any legal gun owner being a hair’s breadth away from “going off their nut” and shooting up a shopping mall, their workplace or a restaurant or something.

Then ask yourself; how come back in the “cowboy days” (aka the “wild” west days) when every cowhand, blacksmith, storekeeper or hotel owner had a loaded firearm nearby if not strapped on their hip, there weren’t these kinds of shootings?

Then ask yourself; even if guns are outlawed and they really could round up every legally-owned firearm from every private citizen in the US, how can the black market purchase or theft of firearms keep them out of the hands of those who – like this mentally-damaged kid or the common criminal or…wait for it…the terrorist – shouldn’t have one.

Yeah, how is it that if terrorism is outlawed, and terrorists are wanted, hunted men, how the heck can they keep getting guns to the ISIS, al Qaeda etc?

And ask yourself this; if there’s already dozens and dozens of laws against murder, assault with a deadly weapon, shooting a firearm within city limits and etc etc etc, how on God’s green earth will one more law or a dozen more laws prohibiting firearm ownership do one danged thing to prevent some lunatic like these mass shooters from striking back at society and shooting up a school, a movie theater, a church or whatever?

The answer is, it won’t. And ask yourself this; why is it that the people crying for gun control will in no way consider putting a well-trained, armed presence inside a school – either several armed teachers or even armed police officers assigned to the school as their regular beat. They don’t want to even to consider any solutions like this. 

And why not? Because “gun control” for liberals is only about control and nothing to do with guns. They just want to take more and more of our individual liberties – firearm ownership is guaranteed in the wording of the Second Amendment remember (“…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."). And a completely disarmed American public would certainly make that a lot easier.

The soft tyranny dictatorship tightens its stranglehold.

Today, in a 7-4 vote, the absolutely out-of-control 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the Hopeless State of Californication upheld a California law that says applicants must supply a "good cause" (aka “just cause”) to obtain a concealed-carry firearms permit.* This ruling overturned a previous decision by that very same court that allowed carry-concealed permits to be granted to applicants who only wanted to have them for personal safety.

This ruling, while binding in nine Western states, sets some terrible precedent that can be used against law-abiding gun owners who currently possess carry-concealed permits granted in the other 41 states – especially if this issue makes it into other Circuits’ appeals courts or the Supreme Court of the United States. This ruling will require even law-abiding citizens to show that they routinely carry large amounts of cash or valuables or are being stalked or threatened or – remember it’s California - are celebrities who fear for their safety.

Realize this appeal attempts to deny the:

1. very wording of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution (item # 2 of the Bill of RIGHTS) that states "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed," and
2. The lawful right of a law-abiding citizen who is legally licensed by a state NOT requiring such a "good cause" (also called "just cause") to have such a carry concealed permit:

Sadly, the soft tyranny dictatorship that our federal government has become is slowly but surely tightening its stranglehold on its subjects. Today was just one more nail in the coffin lid for the once-great nation of the United States.

*FoxNews (9 June, 2016) FoxNews.com. Appeals court rules no constitutional right to carry concealed guns. Retrieved 9 June, 2016 from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/09/appeals-court-rules-no-constitutional-right-to-carry-concealed-guns.html

Why is htis so hard for some people to understand?

Gun Ownership Skyrockets, While Violent Crime Drops…Again Friday, May 27, 2011 This week, the FBI estimated that the number of violent crimes decreased 5.5 percent from 2009 to 2010, including a 4.4 percent decrease in the number of murders. Because the U.S. population increased during the period, the figures imply that the total violent crime per capita rate and the murder rate decreased more than six percent and five percent, respectively. Based upon the preliminary data, it appears that violent crime fell to a 37-year low and murder fell to a 47-year low. The FBI will report final figures for 2010 later this year. We’re repeating ourselves, but, as has been the case for quite a while, the decrease in crime coincided with an increase in the number of privately owned guns—particularly handguns and detachable magazine semi-automatic rifles. For example, Americans bought over 400,000 AR-15s in 2009, and trends in AR-15 sales over the last few years suggest a similar number for 2010. Those who have followed the gun control issue for a few years probably have noticed that with crime declining and gun numbers rising year after year, gun control groups have all but abandoned their previously perennial claims that more guns equal more crime. Even their friends in the news media don’t believe it anymore. The Violence Policy Center and, breaking with past habit, the Brady Campaign didn’t even try to claim that the decrease in crime in 2010 was attributable to gun control. Neither did Mayors Against Illegal Guns, headed by New York City’s gun control activist mayor, Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg’s rare and welcomed silence is to be expected in this instance, however. New York City’s murder rate rose 15 percent despite its severe gun laws, while Bloomberg dedicated himself and lots of money to criticizing the less restrictive laws that are in place in other parts of the country. Speaking of cities with less restrictive gun laws, El Paso had the greatest decrease in murder—58 percent— among cities of over 500,000 population in 2010. For those who are counting, El Paso’s estimated murder rate was 0.8 per 100,000 population, while New York City’s was eight times higher at 6.4. Across the border from El Paso, in Juarez, where the gun laws are more to Bloomberg’s liking, the murder rate is over 100 per 100,000. Adding to the bad news for gun control supporters, the District of Columbia and Chicago—the handgun bans of which were repealed following the Supreme Court’s decisions in the Heller and McDonald cases in 2008 and 2010—experienced decreases in murder of eight percent and six percent, respectively. Source: NRA-ILA :: Gun Ownership Skyrockets, While Violent Crime Drops…Again